However, "
Every image is not a work of art, and every work of art is not an image", as noted by the acknowledged sociologist and specialist in contemporary Art, Nathalie Heinich, during
the conference about NFTs. Indeed, the process of
artification is rather complex. Not every created image (nor object), by virtue of its rarity and creative concept, directly becomes a work of art. There are studies conducted by historians and sociologists and observations made involving the work by institutions, curators and critics, that aim to define it.
"Art emerges over time as the sum total of institutional activities, everyday interactions, technical implementations, and attributions of meaning. Artification is a dynamic process of social change through which new objects and practices emerge and relationships and institutions are transformed." It seeks to clarify and explain how a certain production is meaningful not only for specialized minority groups, "
but to the point where the status of these productions as art becomes common knowledge and goes unquestioned" (
Roberta Shapiro & Nathalie Heinich).
Despite numerous individual initiatives, the status quo of the NFT (as Art) belongs rather within a subjective opinion than an objective and common recognition.
There is a lot of discussion about
The Community around the NFT; sharing ideas, talking on Twitter and at times being invited to certain events, or gaining access to something seen to be at the core of its essence. Obtaining a particular NFT is like an entry ticket to this
community, which is very glam, especially with so many celebrities involved. Nonetheless, it remains rather a limited group, which acclaims the importance of itself as a community much more than what is actually created.